Of all the things to get peeved about, you wouldn't think commercials would be one of them. In spite of avoiding commercials by cutting the cable cord, I have found myself employed at a place that runs ESPN 24/7. While it's not as bad as commercials on Fox News, certain commercials have begun to irk me for reasons that only a software guy can understand. In general, I believe this revulsion can teach us how to test user experiences.
To start, allow me present two exhibits: Jillian Michaels for Nordic-track and Trivago Guy for Trivago. Have you watched them? Good. Are ads for them already populating your sidebar? Allow me to apologize. So, did anything bother you?
Now, here is a second exhibit: Fiddler on the Roof. I'm sorry if I ruin this for you, but the fiddler is not actually playing his instrument. In high school, I saw this movie once in class, and again after I spent a year in orchestra. The second time through, I knew as little about playing the violin as one can, and it still bothered me that the fiddler wasn't successfully playing in sync with the music. The distraction caused by bad miming is well documented. Recent Amazon series Mozart in the Jungle has it. Other movies aren't immune either. Even a talented musician can be affected by it without equal attention to production (try not to notice the out-of-sync miming and white truck in the background 52 seconds in). The core problem is that you need to train someone who is good at acting to fake a highly skilled activity convincingly enough to keep the audience's focus. If the audience knows even a little, their belief is unsuspended, and you can lose all credibility.
Normally, this is fine. in a two hour film or season of a television show, the viewer is pulled in by the drama. The story isn't about how well the artist can play the violin; it is about the character's story. Also, most directors can rely on the majority of their audiences not knowing what skilled activities like playing the violin and hacking actually look like. Camera tricks can make some instruments easier to fake than others. Furthermore, some miming has become acceptable and celebrated through parody. We know it's hard to convey on film. Should that mean we don't tell this story?
Unfortunately, there is a class of film that cannot rely on the social contract to ignore non-experts acting out difficult skills. Its short format leaves no time to pull a person back in after having been jarred from their witless stupor. What pitiless medium is this? Commercials. In 30 seconds or less, the disingenuous spokesman is called out. The thankless medium that pays for most of our entertainment is reviled for cheesy effects, leaps of credulity, and now one more heresy: poorly mimed user interfaces.
Let's return to our exhibits, shall we? Nordic-track wants to sell us another piece of exercise equipment that we will only use as long as we are paying for it. To do this, they've strapped on a touchscreen to navigate workouts. What does Jillian Michaels use to navigate? Two fingers, and she watches the screen as she swipes left. Thinking back to your own interactions with iPads, touchscreen kiosks and mobile phones, when have you ever watched the old screen disappear? And when have two fingers ever been used to navigate a touchscreen?
The second is Trivago Guy. Not only has he drawn attention for being creepy, but his ham-handed interaction with the user interface makes me cringe. Poking at points on a calendar, full-handed presses of the Search button, and similar miming make me look up from my desk and gag. Similar interactions with after-effects like those in the Endurance Extended Warranty commercial make me wonder if anyone thought to proof the commercial before buying ad spots day after day, year after year. An alternative explanation would be that the producers honestly think this is the way people interact with computers. Either one disarms the viewer and places the product as unfavorable in their eyes.
I would like to propose that each of the above cases can be grouped together as potential examples of the Uncanny Valley. As a movie viewer familiar with how a violin is played, I connect notes and the movement of bow in a way that the uninitiated cannot. I reject the characterization as invalid for a brief period, but my emotions pull me back in with other human interactions elicited by the actor's performance. For these commercials, this does not happen. The terrible user interface interactions remove focus from the message of the commercial, and it is judged as unfit just long enough that I reject the product on offer. Worse, subsequent viewings reinforce my first impressions.
Generalized lessons in the User Experience design space are many. After testing a new user interface, I have found it helpful to let the uninitiated take it for a spin. While I have been long-desensitized to bad interaction by other considerations ("It actually works once you get used to it!" being one, "I just want to be done with this." being another), initiates see the unnatural interaction, and one can read the revulsion in their face even when they don't come right out and say it. This commercial for the new product is a failure, and I don't wait around to see them lulled into the same sense of security. It stinks, they know it, and now I do to. While users might not be expected to use a new interface right away, something that is counter-intuitive from the start should be avoided. Depending on the medium, counter-intuitive steps can be overcome, but not without good decisions elsewhere to draw the user back in.
Monday, February 16, 2015
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
Bike Rentals, An Adventure
The local subreddit received a post requesting one of us rent a bike to a visitor while their significant other was at a conference. This spawned an interesting adventure, and I learned a ton.
The post provided me with a list of expectations, and we quickly moved to Private Messages to hash out the details. The end result was $20 per day for a bike, helmet and tools needed to keep you going.
I quickly found out I wasn't as prepared to rent as I had presumed. For the bike, I had a $150 Wal-Mart special with a good amount of wear, baskets on the pedals, and some upgrades like a headlight. The back tire on the bike was completely shot, so any money from this venture was going to go right back into it. I didn't have patches, a portable pump, and my bike tool was nowhere to be found. A trip to JT's and I was set.
The renter was staying at the Green Valley Ranch, a local hotel/resort, and their bell desk was endlessly accommodating. I dropped it off with a note for the person staying in the hotel. I communicated the tag ID to the renter, and I was off. I even did it on the way to work, so it was relatively painless.
Until I got the phone call.
As a software tester, you would think I would learn to test my own stuff before I deploy. Unfortunately, I forgot this portion and ended up handing over a bike with a disabled chain. I got the phone call in the morning after the renter's arrival, and I was frantic and embarrassed. U rushed over on an early lunch, fixed the mangled chain, gave it a spin around the parking lot, and kicked the tires for good measure. Again, the bell staff was extremely accommodating, and it was stowed securely in time for lunch. The rest of the experience was relatively painless. I picked it up after the renter had flown. I paid the bell desk a tip on pick-up. All the kit was there and intact.
Could I streamline and improve this service? Here are some ideas:
So, was it worth it? That is a definite no. Could I make it worthwhile? Maybe.
The cost to take the bike, if everything went smoothly, would be gas and time for delivery, Spread over enough hotels, this could be accomplished relatively easily once the service hit critical mass. The repair was a huge hit to profitability (driving there and back on lunch), but careful testing and integration with deliveries/pickups would also make it something that could be priced in with some research. Theft could be mitigated by insurance, but it would need to be managed carefully and included in the cost. Finally, payment was through PayPal which took a sizable cut. Cash might be better, but since the ideal rental involves never meeting your customer, it is impractical. Credit would slice the charges in half.
An attractive alternative is to offer rental services to the hotels/resorts themselves and only deal with them. It would be a simple way to attract business, and they could take advantage of existing infrastructure for payments, renting, waivers, etc. With enough coverage, it might just make a profit.
The post provided me with a list of expectations, and we quickly moved to Private Messages to hash out the details. The end result was $20 per day for a bike, helmet and tools needed to keep you going.
I quickly found out I wasn't as prepared to rent as I had presumed. For the bike, I had a $150 Wal-Mart special with a good amount of wear, baskets on the pedals, and some upgrades like a headlight. The back tire on the bike was completely shot, so any money from this venture was going to go right back into it. I didn't have patches, a portable pump, and my bike tool was nowhere to be found. A trip to JT's and I was set.
The renter was staying at the Green Valley Ranch, a local hotel/resort, and their bell desk was endlessly accommodating. I dropped it off with a note for the person staying in the hotel. I communicated the tag ID to the renter, and I was off. I even did it on the way to work, so it was relatively painless.
Until I got the phone call.
As a software tester, you would think I would learn to test my own stuff before I deploy. Unfortunately, I forgot this portion and ended up handing over a bike with a disabled chain. I got the phone call in the morning after the renter's arrival, and I was frantic and embarrassed. U rushed over on an early lunch, fixed the mangled chain, gave it a spin around the parking lot, and kicked the tires for good measure. Again, the bell staff was extremely accommodating, and it was stowed securely in time for lunch. The rest of the experience was relatively painless. I picked it up after the renter had flown. I paid the bell desk a tip on pick-up. All the kit was there and intact.
Could I streamline and improve this service? Here are some ideas:
- The sign-up process could be accomplished online.
- Several waivers should be added to make sure the lawyers don't come calling after our first injury.
- Accident insurance and similar services could be added on as well. Neither renter nor owner wants to be caught unawares.
- A service level could also be established: will work on delivery (oops), service calls available within X hours, deposits or charges for repairs, and so forth.
- Instructions for the bell desk, advertisements, and similar services could also be bolted on. Making it easy for the staff engenders trust and is good advertising.
- The kit was mostly good, but delivery could have been more glamorous (kit bag attached to bike instead of in a plastic grocery sack).
- I would make people bring their own helmets or have them available for purchase. Helmets are very hard to gauge if they have gone bad. Why risk the lawsuit if an injury does occur.
So, was it worth it? That is a definite no. Could I make it worthwhile? Maybe.
The cost to take the bike, if everything went smoothly, would be gas and time for delivery, Spread over enough hotels, this could be accomplished relatively easily once the service hit critical mass. The repair was a huge hit to profitability (driving there and back on lunch), but careful testing and integration with deliveries/pickups would also make it something that could be priced in with some research. Theft could be mitigated by insurance, but it would need to be managed carefully and included in the cost. Finally, payment was through PayPal which took a sizable cut. Cash might be better, but since the ideal rental involves never meeting your customer, it is impractical. Credit would slice the charges in half.
An attractive alternative is to offer rental services to the hotels/resorts themselves and only deal with them. It would be a simple way to attract business, and they could take advantage of existing infrastructure for payments, renting, waivers, etc. With enough coverage, it might just make a profit.
Tuesday, January 6, 2015
Context-Driven Testing, An Education
Coming into my fifth year of Software Testing, I began to rethink it as a discipline. The current debate is between traditional methods of testing and more modern schools of thought:
At testing conferences, half the talks were advertisements for bug trackers, test case repositories and automation frameworks. These were great for managing a project, but they didn't support the essence of testing: finding more defects. Expensive tutorials before the conferences showed similar taint: how to use this tool, best practices for testing this specific type of thing, certification in a process and not a portable technique. The cost was the most surprising thing: Thousands of dollars for something I couldn't justify to myself, the eager tester with a training budget to burn.
Delving into webinars brought more despair. A demo of the latest automation tool invariably lead to a pitch to get me to purchase something. The topic purported to discuss principles, but I ended up in the morass of industry jargon. I learned how to write, automate, and justify my time, but I was no closer to actually finding bugs in a more efficient manner. And what's more, I was spammed by vendors for months after. I found zero techniques that were universal.
Finally, the blogs showed a glimmer of hope. Some people wrote about techniques. Others wrote about test cases and how they managed their overhead. Still others advocated that QA should be involved earlier in the development process. Nowhere did anyone extol the virtues of their test management system, bug tracker or automation too in helping them find bugs. This was a breath of fresh air, but it still felt stunted and directionless. My closest analogue, software development, spawned a generation of people applying agile to everything from families to manufacturing, but there wasn't a similarly powerful framework for testers. I started to feel that no one was excited about my new career outside of the context of getting paid for it.
This muddled world left me questioning: Shouldn't there be some "ethos of testing" to unify our efforts just like in agile software development, lean manufacturing, and so forth? Why do vendors have a place at the table at industry conferences? Why isn't anyone embarrassed that the main competitor to major test management software is a spreadsheet? Who cares about my expertise and not just my dollars?
The alternative came through an unlikely route: Twitter. Long a tool of celebrity publicists and companies looking to engage directly with individuals, Twitter also has a reputation as the way to communicate within a subcultures. Have an idea? Publish it in under 140 characters. Want to learn the pulse of an industry? Follow its leaders. Computer security wonks, hackers, and now testers joined my follow list, and I was soon introduced to a new debate: is certification a waste of time? I'd found my people.
The new school touted something called Context-driven Testing. Instead of best practice, effective testing was supposed to be driven by context. Instead of test cases, a set of tools were taught that could be used depending on the product (mainframes are tested differently than mobile devices). Even among superficially similar products, the most effective testers would make judgement calls based on the needs of the customer and the time available. Testing was not a set of rigid processes, but a scientific exploration of the software. The knowledge gained by testing increases the confidence of the organization in the software. In other words, testing challenges the assumptions made by the developers that the product works in the time we have available. This sounded like the meat I was looking for, but the results were amazing too.
In an experiment, I had our work study group put down the ISTQB manual with its test cases, and I instead introduced them to exploratory techniques. We first learned about the requirements and returned a bunch of questions to the developer. Then we tested without scripts and tracked our coverage on a mind map. It was the first time we had been prompted to field trial a technique in our study session. The best part was that a person with very little previous experience in testing was able to pick up the technique almost organically.
This revelation about software testing was what we were all looking for, and it was delivered through experience instead of pronouncement. James Marcus Bach, one of the proponents of Context-driven Testing compared the ISTQB and certification organizations to the medieval medicine of Galen. People wrote down what testing was and proceeded to bleed their employers without knowing why it wasn't finding bugs. Testers were outsourced instead of valued as their techniques were old or ineffective. Yet in spite of all this, the consultants and conferences kept making money printing outdated works of questionable value. Once context-driven techniques come to light, the old ways start dying. We can only hope this continues so that meaningless certs are no longer valued by testers, managers and HR alike.
I am beginning a new training regimen with my testing colleagues based around Context-driven techniques. We hope to learn the techniques and apply them to our current projects and continually grow our skills in this new framework.
- Entrenched methods are represented by the International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB) and its many local equivalents. Certification is their path to expertise, with accompanying wares of training sessions, books, tests and standards.
- Context-driven Testing focuses more on a set of tools and skills that typify testing. Advocate offer classes at conferences, but certs and best-practice are four letter words. They state that there are no best practices, and a tester knows best how to apply the tools to explore, experiment and learn about the system under test.
Something Just Didn't Feel Right
I strode onto this battleground in 2011 as a new manager and new tester. Promoted from an application integration team, I was used to working with outside developers while using and abusing buggy product. This did little to prepare me for the reality of testing: limited time and endless defects! I dove into the online community in the hopes that it would help sort the good from the bad. What I found to be the central influences were conferences, consultants and blogs.At testing conferences, half the talks were advertisements for bug trackers, test case repositories and automation frameworks. These were great for managing a project, but they didn't support the essence of testing: finding more defects. Expensive tutorials before the conferences showed similar taint: how to use this tool, best practices for testing this specific type of thing, certification in a process and not a portable technique. The cost was the most surprising thing: Thousands of dollars for something I couldn't justify to myself, the eager tester with a training budget to burn.
Delving into webinars brought more despair. A demo of the latest automation tool invariably lead to a pitch to get me to purchase something. The topic purported to discuss principles, but I ended up in the morass of industry jargon. I learned how to write, automate, and justify my time, but I was no closer to actually finding bugs in a more efficient manner. And what's more, I was spammed by vendors for months after. I found zero techniques that were universal.
Finally, the blogs showed a glimmer of hope. Some people wrote about techniques. Others wrote about test cases and how they managed their overhead. Still others advocated that QA should be involved earlier in the development process. Nowhere did anyone extol the virtues of their test management system, bug tracker or automation too in helping them find bugs. This was a breath of fresh air, but it still felt stunted and directionless. My closest analogue, software development, spawned a generation of people applying agile to everything from families to manufacturing, but there wasn't a similarly powerful framework for testers. I started to feel that no one was excited about my new career outside of the context of getting paid for it.
This muddled world left me questioning: Shouldn't there be some "ethos of testing" to unify our efforts just like in agile software development, lean manufacturing, and so forth? Why do vendors have a place at the table at industry conferences? Why isn't anyone embarrassed that the main competitor to major test management software is a spreadsheet? Who cares about my expertise and not just my dollars?
"Answers" and Answers
For a long time, I thought the answer was in certification. Surely, if ever there was an organization that could be a cheerleader for quality, it would be the ISTQB. However, the reality is much different. Manuals are filled with process, conferences host vendors and not practice sessions, and training classes are about extracting fees and not learning techniques. The certification exam that guarantees your resume goes to the top of the pile and organization that proctors it is a laughing stock.The alternative came through an unlikely route: Twitter. Long a tool of celebrity publicists and companies looking to engage directly with individuals, Twitter also has a reputation as the way to communicate within a subcultures. Have an idea? Publish it in under 140 characters. Want to learn the pulse of an industry? Follow its leaders. Computer security wonks, hackers, and now testers joined my follow list, and I was soon introduced to a new debate: is certification a waste of time? I'd found my people.
The new school touted something called Context-driven Testing. Instead of best practice, effective testing was supposed to be driven by context. Instead of test cases, a set of tools were taught that could be used depending on the product (mainframes are tested differently than mobile devices). Even among superficially similar products, the most effective testers would make judgement calls based on the needs of the customer and the time available. Testing was not a set of rigid processes, but a scientific exploration of the software. The knowledge gained by testing increases the confidence of the organization in the software. In other words, testing challenges the assumptions made by the developers that the product works in the time we have available. This sounded like the meat I was looking for, but the results were amazing too.
In an experiment, I had our work study group put down the ISTQB manual with its test cases, and I instead introduced them to exploratory techniques. We first learned about the requirements and returned a bunch of questions to the developer. Then we tested without scripts and tracked our coverage on a mind map. It was the first time we had been prompted to field trial a technique in our study session. The best part was that a person with very little previous experience in testing was able to pick up the technique almost organically.
This revelation about software testing was what we were all looking for, and it was delivered through experience instead of pronouncement. James Marcus Bach, one of the proponents of Context-driven Testing compared the ISTQB and certification organizations to the medieval medicine of Galen. People wrote down what testing was and proceeded to bleed their employers without knowing why it wasn't finding bugs. Testers were outsourced instead of valued as their techniques were old or ineffective. Yet in spite of all this, the consultants and conferences kept making money printing outdated works of questionable value. Once context-driven techniques come to light, the old ways start dying. We can only hope this continues so that meaningless certs are no longer valued by testers, managers and HR alike.
Where Next?
After stumbling through the world of testing for a few years, I have abandoned certification as a path to expertise. As with computer security, network administration and technical support, certifications are a poor way of communicating true expertise. This revelation places testers firmly in the camp of indispensable elements of the development organization. They are not monkeys running scripts but knowledge workers with a valuable investigative skill that challenge the product from all angles. They cannot be outsourced if you hope to be successful, and they cannot be replaced by automation.I am beginning a new training regimen with my testing colleagues based around Context-driven techniques. We hope to learn the techniques and apply them to our current projects and continually grow our skills in this new framework.
Further Reading
- A Context-driven Testing manifesto of sorts
- Black Box Software Testing, Coursework in Context-driven Testing
- Rapid Software Testing, James Marcus Bach's courses on Context-driven approaches:
- Exploratory Testing techniques explained
- Testing is not Automation. Why Automation is another tool and not a cure all.
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
2014 Board Game Buying Guide
I've been playing games with people at the office, and it has shown me that you can get a game in with even a short lunch and new players. I decided to put together a quick list of game recommendations based on venue and number of players. Links to Amazon are provided, but most of these titles can be purchased from your Friendly Local Game Store.
Lunch
Bring co-workers together, let off some steam, and renew rivalries between departments with this selection of quick and easy games selected to allow you to teach and play in under 30 minutes.
- Love Letter is a card game of bluffing and card counting with just 16 cards. It handles 2-4 players, but it is best with 4. Also, it comes in a number of different re-themes, so you can get a non-threatening version to appeal more to co-workers.
- Tsuro of the Seas handles 2-8 players. This "last man standing" tile game has compelling artwork, fast rounds, and dead simple rules. A whole game seldom lasts more than 15 minutes so people can jump in with little fear of going over their lunch time. There are simpler versions and expansions, so you can get as much depth as you want in the time allotted.
- Hey That's My Fish plays well for between 2 and 4 players. You should be able to explain rules while setting it up. All about area control, the gradually shrinking board is apt to cause panic even in the normally stone-faced players from Finance.
Date Night
Games that play best with or are designed for just two people can test the limits of your affection or bring you closer together (no warranty either way). Though these games will work at work, teaching might take longer so an hour lunch is preferred for newer players.
- Hive is one of the few abstract games on this list (like chess or checkers). It presents the elegance of chess without a board, and the pieces have heft and make a wonderful clacking sound like Majong tiles.
- Jaipur is a colorful trading game whose tokens and cards make a visually impressive setup. The 2 of 3 mechanics means it is natural to play round after round. This game used to be rare, but it has benefited from a recent reprint.
- Star Wars X-Wing Miniatures Game maxes out the nerd factor. This is as close as you can get to a war game, so check with your significant other before taking the leap. Games run about 45 minutes, and it plays in a space the size of your dining room table. Best of all, there are endless expansions to add iconic and obscure characters to your fleet of ships.
Family/Friends Game Night
Have more than two? Hate Monopoly as much as I do? This mix of competitive and cooperative games are sure to show you what the modern board gaming renaissance is all about.
- Forbidden Desert is a cooperative game where you play against the game to avoid thirst, storms and the heat to get out of the desert alive. The mechanics and components are top notch, and it plays in under an hour.
- In King of Tokyo, players take the role of giant monsters vying for control of Tokyo. A fast paced dice game, the randomness and ridiculousness of it all is a hit.
- Card game The Builders: Middle Ages is a great worker placement game: hire and set workers to build a town. The rules are simple, but the gameplay is complex. This definitely benefits from replayability and the tin means it is sturdy enough to go anywhere.
- Love Scrabble but have that one friend that outstrips you every single game? Try Qwirkle for scrabble like crosswords without the burden of words. It is more puzzle than game, depending on how cut-throat you get.
- Ticket To Ride: Europe is rummy with a board, and this edition of the game is fantastic. I learned more geography from this game than I did in grade school, and the artwork is fantastic. Expansions are available and cover alternate maps and expanded ticket options. It even has an App version you can pass-and-play if you don't want the fancy box.
Monday, December 8, 2014
Clark County, Nevada Elder Abuse Resources
I was concerned for the safety of a family member who is older not long after their spouse passed away. Below are some things I learned about Elder Abuse, the resources available to help those in need (individuals or family), and things to do when investigating elder abuse.
Before going nuclear on someone new in your relative's life, first do the single most important thing: talk to your older relative. Often, misunderstandings or matters of privacy can be sorted out without resorting to law enforcement, state assistance or subterfuge. The matter of trust between you and your relative is the single most important factor in maintaining their long-term health and well-being. If you lose their trust, you lose almost all ability to help them.
If you must get the police involved, minimize the impact on your relative. See if they will come around when you try to have a person escorted off the property. Ensure your relative is not involved in any illegal activity before involving the police, and, most importantly, get the consent of your relative before escalating. You must maintain their trust, and asymmetric reactions to otherwise benign or diffusable situations can ruin that bond and expose a vulnerable relative to harm from both the intruder and the police.
Before going nuclear on someone new in your relative's life, first do the single most important thing: talk to your older relative. Often, misunderstandings or matters of privacy can be sorted out without resorting to law enforcement, state assistance or subterfuge. The matter of trust between you and your relative is the single most important factor in maintaining their long-term health and well-being. If you lose their trust, you lose almost all ability to help them.
Local Police Resources
Police seem to only be able to make 'welfare checks' for elderly people that outsiders suspect are being abused. They can only visit the premises when the person is home. The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Operator and Dispatch informed me that there are dedicated Elder Abuse detectives. Unfortunately, they only operate M-F, 7-4. As the crisis was after this time, we couldn't get a welfare check immediately. The numbers for these departments are below:- Metro Operator: 702-455-8697
- Metro Dispatch 702-828-3307
- Elder Abuse Detectives: 702-828-3111 (Hours are 7-4, no voice mail)
State Resources
Though I I have not taken advantage of these resources, there may have been help available through the Aging and Disabilities Services connected through the county. Comparable services may exist locally in your neighborhood. Perhaps there are some interventions that would be helpful going forward?- http://www.shouselaw.com/nevada/elderabuse.html
- http://www.health.nv.gov/HCQC/SB129ElderAbuseTrainingforWebsites.pdf
- In Nevada, crimes committed against elderly command double the sentence.
Social Engineering
When trying to find out more about people that have entered a loved one's life unexpectedly, unexpected phone calls from unknown people are a great source of more information. Generally, act as if the person is at home but not available. The person on the other end of the line may divulge information that gives you clues about the intruder. Effective phrases are below:- "Yeah, he's here but he's busy. He asks what you need."
- "Hold on, let me get her...She's here but can't pick up right now."
- "Who is this again? I didn't get that down last time."
- "His phone is dead. What number can he reach you at?"
- "What was it again that you're meeting for?"
If you must get the police involved, minimize the impact on your relative. See if they will come around when you try to have a person escorted off the property. Ensure your relative is not involved in any illegal activity before involving the police, and, most importantly, get the consent of your relative before escalating. You must maintain their trust, and asymmetric reactions to otherwise benign or diffusable situations can ruin that bond and expose a vulnerable relative to harm from both the intruder and the police.
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
R00tz Asylum 2014
I took Ethan to the event run in parallel with DEF CON, R00tz Asylum. I think he had a blast as they covered a lot of traditional hacker topics at multiple levels of complexity. The highlights are below.
Structure
The event was held in the Crown Theater at the Rio. It was about a 10 minute walk from DEF CON proper. The separation was nice as it made for a more quiet and contained experience. The stage was occupied by a speaker almost all the time. Spread around the perimeter (mezzanine?) were tables with activities that changed every day. Kids could choose to listen, play or work on challenges. Most activities stayed the entire day, though some were more transient.This setup was advantageous for my son. He has little ability to focus on any one thing for an extended period of time, so the variety of activities was nice. Much like its parent conference, R00tz Asylum did well when it focused on hands-on learning. Toool, Google and Wickr held contests and learning opportunities that pushed attendees and their parents to participate together. In particular, Ethan loved the puzzles, and I finally got him to solder something. He did a bang-up job.
Speakers
The speaker experience was less than optimal with a few notable exceptions. The stand-outs were Gene Bransfield's hilarious "Weaponizing your Pets" and Meredith Patterson's engaging activity "The Telephone Game" about Man-in-the-Middle attacks. Special mention goes to @muffenboy and Esau Kang for being kid attendees and speakers. For the rest, it would be good to learn that speaking to children is not the same as speaking to hackers, and most talks were too technical, lacked a hands-on component, and thus ended up being torture for the little ones. From speaking with the organizers, I can tell this is something they are trying to focus on next year.The Gift
R00tz Asylum is the opposite of DEF CON in one respect: it relies on sponsors to add pizzazz and to make ends meet. One of those traditions that may or may not hold in coming years is the gift of a hackable piece of technology to attendees. This year brought ASUS Chromebooks care of Google. My son was enthralled, and I spent most of the conference convincing him to get off the Chromebook and out to the activities. By the end of the conference, we had Linux in addition to Chrome, and we were running Wireshark thanks to perseverance by Joe and Chris, a father/son team. This effort won Chris a trophy, even. My son begged me to put Minecraft on there, but then quickly forgot how to get back to it and reformatted his Chromebook undoing all our hard work. Hats off to Google, and congrats to Chris on the win.
Hardware Hacking
By far, my favorite part of the conference was the Hardware Hacking table. Not only did the goodie bag include a HakTeam Throwing Star LAN Tap, but a table full of old equipment was available from which attendees could rip apart and salvage components. The LAN Taps were used in an activity that taught wireshark and packet sniffing. The hardware component salvage table was exploited for speakers, LEDs, gears and motors for all sorts of toys. I am definitely bringing projects for Ethan next year. I already recommended the salvage table to the official DEF CON Hardware Hacking Village. Las Vegas thrift shops may see a run on their printers, VCRs and routers before next year's conference.Lock picking
The one talk and table I was surprised that Ethan was interested in was from Toool. Their interactive 101 talk caught his attention, and we worked on a lock at their companion activity table. Though he ended up losing interest before successfully opening a lock, it gave me a clue of the type of activity he could do on his own between conferences.
Going Forward
I would definitely recommend any hacker parent to bring their child to R00tz Asylum. Its expanding and evolving to be a great summer camp weekend that dovetails with the DEF CON experience. As the organizers ger more experienced, I expect the content to grow and change to fit the kids and their interests. We all started somewhere, and I hope R00tz is that start for the next generation. I started a subreddit for R00tz, though it hasn't taken off.
As for Ethan and I, we are preparing a talk on how to hack Skylanders figures. We hope it will be a fun combination of encryption, hardware hacking and games that will draw the attention of attendees and inspire them to really dig in and explore the technology that is used around them every day.
Friday, October 31, 2014
Resources to Check for Dead Links on a Website
http://www.brokenlinkcheck.com/
This external service hits your site and follows each link. It is intelligent enough to check for loops. Since it is an external service, it may artificially drive up hit count.
Check My Links Chrome Extension
This very handy chrome extension checks link status and places the results in-line. Fairly turn-key, it even keeps a list of links to not follow that you can add to as you go along. It seems to have trouble with blogspot controls and extensions, though adding them to the blacklist might be the solution.
Xenu's Link Sleuth
Heard about this one on UTest. I am eager to try it out. Free, long history, and automatable: all the right pieces for success.
Add more as you find them to the comments.
This external service hits your site and follows each link. It is intelligent enough to check for loops. Since it is an external service, it may artificially drive up hit count.
Check My Links Chrome Extension
This very handy chrome extension checks link status and places the results in-line. Fairly turn-key, it even keeps a list of links to not follow that you can add to as you go along. It seems to have trouble with blogspot controls and extensions, though adding them to the blacklist might be the solution.
Xenu's Link Sleuth
Heard about this one on UTest. I am eager to try it out. Free, long history, and automatable: all the right pieces for success.
Add more as you find them to the comments.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)